Paterno did not deserve a suspension. (As Ex governor Corbet stated), who was on the board that approved the fines and punishments handed down by the NCAA. Corbet loses election
EX Gov CORBET STATEMENT
The NCAA had no proof of a cover up or any evidence of wrong doing on the part of the officials.
What Corbet suggested in so many word was that Paterno was guilty but he didn't deserve the punishment he got because he was an old man fixing to retire. That makes Corbet look like the good guy but still says Paterno was guilty.
If Corbet thought Paterno was guilty where's the proof?
Where is the 2001 evidence? The NCAA admitted they didn't have anything (Proof) and they bluffed the school into accepting the punishments. Why?
No comments:
Post a Comment